De hecho la tasa de inflación peruana iba a bajar bastante para el proximo año.Marvey21 escribió: ↑Mar Jun 20, 2023 4:09 pm MEF: economía peruana se aceleraría entre el tercer y cuarto trimestre de 2023
Las expectativas de los agentes económicos se mantienen
https://andina.pe/agencia/noticia-mef-e ... 44466.aspx
"Estamos saliendo de una crisis y las expectativas se mantienen. Hay optimismo en los agentes económicos pero con cautela", manifestó.
Sin embargo, mencionó que mayo y junio serán afectados por la crisis de fertilizantes y la postergación de la primera temporada de pesca.
"Pero nos ratificamos en que la economía peruana se va a acelerar contundentemente en el tercer y cuarto trimestre del año", enfatizó.
Cambios
Contreras refirió que en comparación con el año pasado, el país está saliendo de una crisis institucional que implicó un gran riesgo para el país.
"Ese riesgo se ha ido disipando a pesar del contexto internacional complejo. La resiliencia de la economía peruana se mantiene tanto a nivel local como internacional”, dijo.
América Latina | Economía
-
Revere - Miembro Fundador
- Reactions:
- Mensajes: 768
- Registrado: Mar Mar 21, 2023 8:57 pm
- Humor:
- Country:
Chile (cl)
Re: América Latina | Economía
Mensaje
por Revere » Mar Jun 20, 2023 9:40 pm
Somos el mejor país de Chile, Hermanoooo
-
Peregrin Tuk - Erü the One
- Reactions:
- Mensajes: 802
- Registrado: Vie Mar 17, 2023 2:48 pm
- Humor:
- Country:
Chile (cl)
Re: América Latina | Economía
Mensaje
por Peregrin Tuk » Vie Jun 23, 2023 7:49 pm
Todas bajaban bastante, en porcentaje la mejor era de las peruanas, y la colombiana.Revere escribió: ↑Mar Jun 20, 2023 9:40 pmDe hecho la tasa de inflación peruana iba a bajar bastante para el proximo año.Marvey21 escribió: ↑Mar Jun 20, 2023 4:09 pm MEF: economía peruana se aceleraría entre el tercer y cuarto trimestre de 2023
Las expectativas de los agentes económicos se mantienen
https://andina.pe/agencia/noticia-mef-e ... 44466.aspx
"Estamos saliendo de una crisis y las expectativas se mantienen. Hay optimismo en los agentes económicos pero con cautela", manifestó.
Sin embargo, mencionó que mayo y junio serán afectados por la crisis de fertilizantes y la postergación de la primera temporada de pesca.
"Pero nos ratificamos en que la economía peruana se va a acelerar contundentemente en el tercer y cuarto trimestre del año", enfatizó.
Cambios
Contreras refirió que en comparación con el año pasado, el país está saliendo de una crisis institucional que implicó un gran riesgo para el país.
"Ese riesgo se ha ido disipando a pesar del contexto internacional complejo. La resiliencia de la economía peruana se mantiene tanto a nivel local como internacional”, dijo.
-
JLO - Moderador Global
- Reactions:
- Mensajes: 910
- Registrado: Vie Mar 17, 2023 7:24 pm
- Humor:
- Country:
Chile (cl)
Re: América Latina | Economía
Mensaje
por JLO » Mar Jul 11, 2023 7:30 pm
The longer I live on this planet, the more I understand why rooster's start their day screaming
-
Peregrin Tuk
- Erü the One
- Reactions:
- Mensajes: 802
- Registrado: Vie Mar 17, 2023 2:48 pm
- Humor:
- Country:
Chile (cl)
Re: América Latina | Economía
Mensaje
por Peregrin Tuk » Vie Jul 14, 2023 9:57 am
The chips battle
Publicly, the U.S. and China have turned down the heat recently on their relationship. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and Secretary of State Antony Blinken have both visited Beijing in recent weeks partly to improve communication between the two countries. “President Biden and I do not see the relationship between the U.S. and China through the frame of great-power conflict,” Yellen said at the end of her trip.
But the underlying reality is unchanged: The U.S. and China remain competitors for global supremacy. The two countries are great powers, and they are often in conflict.
Look at what’s happened since Yellen returned home on Sunday:
U.S. officials announced that in the run-up to Blinken’s trip last month, hackers apparently affiliated with the Chinese government broke into the email accounts of top U.S. officials, including Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo, a noted critic of China’s policies. The spy balloon that flew over the U.S. early this year may have received more attention, but the hacking of high-level email accounts seems more belligerent.
Biden administration officials appear close to announcing rules restricting American firms from investing in many cutting-edge Chinese technology companies. Advocates say the rules are intended to keep Americans from financing threats to U.S. national security. Biden’s aides have held off on announcing the policy, partly to avoid disrupting the recent diplomatic outreach. (Here is a Times story with more details.)
The U.S. continues to enforce a strict set of restrictions intended to hamper China’s ability to produce advanced semiconductors. The Biden administration put the restrictions in place Oct. 7. “If you’d told me about these rules five years ago, I would’ve told you that’s an act of war — we’d have to be at war,” said C.J. Muse, a semiconductor expert at Evercore ISI, an investment advisory firm.
Choke points
Muse's quotation comes from a new Times Magazine article by Alex Palmer, and I recommend making time to read it this weekend. The article explains how the Biden administration is trying to prevent China from getting access to cutting-edge semiconductors, which are vital to many digital technologies. By doing so, the U.S. hopes to slow China’s efforts to build advanced weapons, develop artificial intelligence and surveil its own citizens and people in other countries.
The U.S. believes it can succeed, Alex writes, because the semiconductor industry is “a web of mutual interdependence, spread all over the planet in highly specialized regions and companies, its feats made possible by supply chains of exceptional length and complexity.” The most advanced operations tend to be located in either the U.S. or its allies, such as Japan, the Netherlands and Taiwan — three governments that have all signed on to the Oct. 7 restrictions.
“The entire industry can only function with U.S. inputs,” Chris Miller, a professor at Tufts University, said. “In every facility that’s remotely close to the cutting edge, there’s U.S. tools, U.S. design software and U.S. intellectual property throughout the process.” (Miller recently appeared on Ezra Klein’s podcast to talk about the global importance of semiconductors.)
So far, the semiconductor restrictions seem to be having an effect, analysts say. China is struggling to get as many advanced semiconductors as it needs and is instead trying to build up its domestic industry. Ultimately, it will probably succeed in doing so. By then, though, the U.S. and its allies hope to have raced further ahead.
Unfulfilled promises
High speed rail lines on the outskirts of Beijing. James Hill for The New York Times
The Oct. 7 rules are a telling sign of how much U.S. policy toward China has changed. For decades, presidents from both parties vowed that economic engagement would benefit both China and the U.S. As China became richer, the politicians claimed, its development would provide jobs for American workers, while China itself would become a freer country and more friendly to the West.
Only some of those promises came true.
China did become richer. Its rise has included arguably the most rapid decline of poverty in human history, improving the material living conditions of hundreds of millions of people. Many American investors and corporate executives also flourished, as their companies became more profitable by moving parts of the supply chain to China and by selling goods in China.
But China became less democratic, not more, in the process. Its rise has also hurt millions of U.S. workers more than it has helped them. One academic study uses the phrase “China shock” to describe the devastating effect on factory jobs and wages in many U.S. communities over the past two decades. People in these same places have become more likely to vote for extremist political candidates, the researchers found in a follow-up study.
Now U.S. policy makers of both parties are more often treating China as the rival that it has become. True, there are risks to this new approach — including an actual war, which could be devastating. And China and the U.S. will need to continue cooperating on some issues, especially climate change, even as they compete on many others.
By trying to keep the lines of communication open, Blinken, Yellen and their counterparts in Beijing can reduce the threat of misunderstanding and catastrophe. But they can’t change the fact that China and the U.S. are competitors, not allies. The two countries are indeed engaged in a great-power struggle.
What’s next: John Kerry, Biden’s special climate envoy, will arrive in China on Sunday to restart climate talks between the countries, the world’s two largest polluters. Congressional Republicans accused Kerry at a hearing yesterday of being soft on China.
Publicly, the U.S. and China have turned down the heat recently on their relationship. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and Secretary of State Antony Blinken have both visited Beijing in recent weeks partly to improve communication between the two countries. “President Biden and I do not see the relationship between the U.S. and China through the frame of great-power conflict,” Yellen said at the end of her trip.
But the underlying reality is unchanged: The U.S. and China remain competitors for global supremacy. The two countries are great powers, and they are often in conflict.
Look at what’s happened since Yellen returned home on Sunday:
U.S. officials announced that in the run-up to Blinken’s trip last month, hackers apparently affiliated with the Chinese government broke into the email accounts of top U.S. officials, including Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo, a noted critic of China’s policies. The spy balloon that flew over the U.S. early this year may have received more attention, but the hacking of high-level email accounts seems more belligerent.
Biden administration officials appear close to announcing rules restricting American firms from investing in many cutting-edge Chinese technology companies. Advocates say the rules are intended to keep Americans from financing threats to U.S. national security. Biden’s aides have held off on announcing the policy, partly to avoid disrupting the recent diplomatic outreach. (Here is a Times story with more details.)
The U.S. continues to enforce a strict set of restrictions intended to hamper China’s ability to produce advanced semiconductors. The Biden administration put the restrictions in place Oct. 7. “If you’d told me about these rules five years ago, I would’ve told you that’s an act of war — we’d have to be at war,” said C.J. Muse, a semiconductor expert at Evercore ISI, an investment advisory firm.
Choke points
Muse's quotation comes from a new Times Magazine article by Alex Palmer, and I recommend making time to read it this weekend. The article explains how the Biden administration is trying to prevent China from getting access to cutting-edge semiconductors, which are vital to many digital technologies. By doing so, the U.S. hopes to slow China’s efforts to build advanced weapons, develop artificial intelligence and surveil its own citizens and people in other countries.
The U.S. believes it can succeed, Alex writes, because the semiconductor industry is “a web of mutual interdependence, spread all over the planet in highly specialized regions and companies, its feats made possible by supply chains of exceptional length and complexity.” The most advanced operations tend to be located in either the U.S. or its allies, such as Japan, the Netherlands and Taiwan — three governments that have all signed on to the Oct. 7 restrictions.
“The entire industry can only function with U.S. inputs,” Chris Miller, a professor at Tufts University, said. “In every facility that’s remotely close to the cutting edge, there’s U.S. tools, U.S. design software and U.S. intellectual property throughout the process.” (Miller recently appeared on Ezra Klein’s podcast to talk about the global importance of semiconductors.)
So far, the semiconductor restrictions seem to be having an effect, analysts say. China is struggling to get as many advanced semiconductors as it needs and is instead trying to build up its domestic industry. Ultimately, it will probably succeed in doing so. By then, though, the U.S. and its allies hope to have raced further ahead.
Unfulfilled promises
High speed rail lines on the outskirts of Beijing. James Hill for The New York Times
The Oct. 7 rules are a telling sign of how much U.S. policy toward China has changed. For decades, presidents from both parties vowed that economic engagement would benefit both China and the U.S. As China became richer, the politicians claimed, its development would provide jobs for American workers, while China itself would become a freer country and more friendly to the West.
Only some of those promises came true.
China did become richer. Its rise has included arguably the most rapid decline of poverty in human history, improving the material living conditions of hundreds of millions of people. Many American investors and corporate executives also flourished, as their companies became more profitable by moving parts of the supply chain to China and by selling goods in China.
But China became less democratic, not more, in the process. Its rise has also hurt millions of U.S. workers more than it has helped them. One academic study uses the phrase “China shock” to describe the devastating effect on factory jobs and wages in many U.S. communities over the past two decades. People in these same places have become more likely to vote for extremist political candidates, the researchers found in a follow-up study.
Now U.S. policy makers of both parties are more often treating China as the rival that it has become. True, there are risks to this new approach — including an actual war, which could be devastating. And China and the U.S. will need to continue cooperating on some issues, especially climate change, even as they compete on many others.
By trying to keep the lines of communication open, Blinken, Yellen and their counterparts in Beijing can reduce the threat of misunderstanding and catastrophe. But they can’t change the fact that China and the U.S. are competitors, not allies. The two countries are indeed engaged in a great-power struggle.
What’s next: John Kerry, Biden’s special climate envoy, will arrive in China on Sunday to restart climate talks between the countries, the world’s two largest polluters. Congressional Republicans accused Kerry at a hearing yesterday of being soft on China.
-
JLO
- Moderador Global
- Reactions:
- Mensajes: 910
- Registrado: Vie Mar 17, 2023 7:24 pm
- Humor:
- Country:
Chile (cl)
Re: América Latina | Economía
Mensaje
por JLO » Mié Ago 02, 2023 1:24 pm
The longer I live on this planet, the more I understand why rooster's start their day screaming
-
Marvey21 - Usuario Latinscrapers
- Reactions:
- Mensajes: 236
- Registrado: Mié Abr 05, 2023 2:50 pm
- Humor:
- Country:
Peru (pe)
Re: América Latina | Economía
Mensaje
por Marvey21 » Mié Ago 02, 2023 4:35 pm
Perú también cayó 1% en junio, y en julio es probable que también estemos en negativo, ya vamos 2 trimestres seguidos en rojo, pucha así nosé que pasará con este país y la región...
A veces siento que las economías de ambos países se comportan de manera similar, será porque vendemoscasi los mismos productos?
A veces siento que las economías de ambos países se comportan de manera similar, será porque vendemoscasi los mismos productos?
Don´t play with me ...
-
Olvan - Miembro Fundador
- Reactions:
- Mensajes: 2612
- Registrado: Vie Mar 17, 2023 4:19 pm
- Humor:
- Country:
Chile (cl)
Re: América Latina | Economía
Mensaje
por Olvan » Mié Ago 02, 2023 6:14 pm
En el caso de Chile todo es culpa del merluzo Boric.Marvey21 escribió: ↑Mié Ago 02, 2023 4:35 pm Perú también cayó 1% en junio, y en julio es probable que también estemos en negativo, ya vamos 2 trimestres seguidos en rojo, pucha así nosé que pasará con este país y la región...
A veces siento que las economías de ambos países se comportan de manera similar, será porque vendemoscasi los mismos productos?
Es tiempo de conquistar la Tierra!
-
JLO
- Moderador Global
- Reactions:
- Mensajes: 910
- Registrado: Vie Mar 17, 2023 7:24 pm
- Humor:
- Country:
Chile (cl)
Re: América Latina | Economía
Mensaje
por JLO » Jue Ago 03, 2023 3:13 pm
El problema de Chile es el despelote institucional, no hay confianza en el país. Chile va camino a ser un país más en la región, con renta promedio y nivel de desarrollo acorde a los vecinos.
The longer I live on this planet, the more I understand why rooster's start their day screaming
-
JLO
- Moderador Global
- Reactions:
- Mensajes: 910
- Registrado: Vie Mar 17, 2023 7:24 pm
- Humor:
- Country:
Chile (cl)
Re: América Latina | Economía
Mensaje
por JLO » Vie Ago 04, 2023 1:19 pm
Hace rato, ya dentro de poco nos codearemos con los vecinos. Sad but true...
The longer I live on this planet, the more I understand why rooster's start their day screaming
-
Olvan
- Miembro Fundador
- Reactions:
- Mensajes: 2612
- Registrado: Vie Mar 17, 2023 4:19 pm
- Humor:
- Country:
Chile (cl)
Re: América Latina | Economía
Mensaje
por Olvan » Mar Sep 19, 2023 6:51 pm
Chile vuelve a caer en Ranking de Libertad Económica y obtiene su peor resultado desde 1990
El país quedó en el puesto 30 del listado y perdió su histórico liderazgo en Latinoamérica, que mantenía desde 2003, siendo desplazado por Costa Rica.
Según el informe de Libertad Económica Anual 2023 del Fraser Institute de Canadá, Chile retrocedió seis puestos y quedó en el lugar 30 del ranking.
De esta manera, el país anotó su tercera caída consecutiva en el índice y obtuvo la calificación más baja desde 1990, año en que comenzó a realizarse la medición.
Además, Chile perdió su histórico liderazgo en Latinoamérica, que mantenía desde 2003, siendo desplazado por Costa Rica, que se ubicó en el puesto 21.
El estudio consideró datos de 2021 e incluyó factores como: tamaño del gobierno; estructura legal y derechos de propiedad; estabilidad de la moneda; libertad para el comercio internacional; y regulación, entre otros.
https://www.biobiochile.cl/noticias/eco ... 1990.shtml
El país quedó en el puesto 30 del listado y perdió su histórico liderazgo en Latinoamérica, que mantenía desde 2003, siendo desplazado por Costa Rica.
Según el informe de Libertad Económica Anual 2023 del Fraser Institute de Canadá, Chile retrocedió seis puestos y quedó en el lugar 30 del ranking.
De esta manera, el país anotó su tercera caída consecutiva en el índice y obtuvo la calificación más baja desde 1990, año en que comenzó a realizarse la medición.
Además, Chile perdió su histórico liderazgo en Latinoamérica, que mantenía desde 2003, siendo desplazado por Costa Rica, que se ubicó en el puesto 21.
El estudio consideró datos de 2021 e incluyó factores como: tamaño del gobierno; estructura legal y derechos de propiedad; estabilidad de la moneda; libertad para el comercio internacional; y regulación, entre otros.
https://www.biobiochile.cl/noticias/eco ... 1990.shtml
Es tiempo de conquistar la Tierra!
-
Marsupial 2.0 - Miembro Fundador
- Reactions:
- Mensajes: 1746
- Registrado: Vie Mar 17, 2023 4:39 pm
- Humor:
- Country:
Norway (no)
Re: América Latina | Economía
Mensaje
por Marsupial 2.0 » Jue Sep 28, 2023 4:00 pm
el presidente y su circo de ministros que no tiene idea de como gestionar absolutamente nada, no van a detenerse hasta haber destruido el pais. lo dijo el propio boric, que Chile seria la tumba del neoliberalismo y que ellos venian a traer inestabilidad. En serio esperaba la gente otro resultado? De verdad es que veces pienso que la gente se merece lo que le pasa, pero me acuerdo del resto de chilenos sensatos que no creyeron en las promesas de esta manga de ladrones. Estoy emputecido con lo que estan haciendo con el pais.
-
Olvan
- Miembro Fundador
- Reactions:
- Mensajes: 2612
- Registrado: Vie Mar 17, 2023 4:19 pm
- Humor:
- Country:
Chile (cl)
Re: América Latina | Economía
Mensaje
por Olvan » Jue Sep 28, 2023 6:33 pm
Es muy triste Marsu como el país se ha deteriorado tanto por culpa de estos imbéciles del gobierno. 
Es tiempo de conquistar la Tierra!
-
Marvey.21 - Usuario Latinscrapers
- Reactions:
- Mensajes: 877
- Registrado: Jue Sep 14, 2023 12:38 pm
- Humor:
- Country:
Peru (pe)
Re: América Latina | Economía
Mensaje
por Marvey.21 » Jue Sep 28, 2023 11:24 pm
Creo esto estápasando en varios países de la región, en Perú estamos igual, decrecimiento del PBI en los 3 primeros trimestres, y la cosa no pinta bien el siguiente año tampoco, se siente en la calle que la economía anda de mal en peor, se siente en los negocios.
I'm done.
-
Marvey.21
- Usuario Latinscrapers
- Reactions:
- Mensajes: 877
- Registrado: Jue Sep 14, 2023 12:38 pm
- Humor:
- Country:
Peru (pe)
Re: América Latina | Economía
Mensaje
por Marvey.21 » Jue Sep 28, 2023 11:30 pm
El año pasado estaba asíOlvan escribió: ↑Mar Sep 19, 2023 6:51 pm Chile vuelve a caer en Ranking de Libertad Económica y obtiene su peor resultado desde 1990
El país quedó en el puesto 30 del listado y perdió su histórico liderazgo en Latinoamérica, que mantenía desde 2003, siendo desplazado por Costa Rica.
Según el informe de Libertad Económica Anual 2023 del Fraser Institute de Canadá, Chile retrocedió seis puestos y quedó en el lugar 30 del ranking.
De esta manera, el país anotó su tercera caída consecutiva en el índice y obtuvo la calificación más baja desde 1990, año en que comenzó a realizarse la medición.
Además, Chile perdió su histórico liderazgo en Latinoamérica, que mantenía desde 2003, siendo desplazado por Costa Rica, que se ubicó en el puesto 21.
El estudio consideró datos de 2021 e incluyó factores como: tamaño del gobierno; estructura legal y derechos de propiedad; estabilidad de la moneda; libertad para el comercio internacional; y regulación, entre otros.
https://www.biobiochile.cl/noticias/eco ... 1990.shtml
I'm done.